Over Our Dead Bodies…

It was the last refuge. Where vampires, werewolves, and innumerable other creatures that went bump in the night had succumbed to the Twilight phenomenon, I could at least take comfort that the zombie would remain uncompromised at the hands of the YAF romance crowd. There is just nothing sexy about a rotting corpse, no matter how many Zombie Pin-Up girl calendars I’ve seen at conventions. I have always chosen to believe that the people making those and buying them are doing so ironically, because any other interpretation is madness.

No, the modern, post-Romero zombie is a wonderful thing, a force of nature, a blank slate of hunger onto which we project our own very human flaws. Like the xenomorphs of Aliens, you don’t see them fucking each other over for a percentage. Or fucking, for that matter. And definitely, definitively not angsting about fucking. When people (like luminary hobbit enthusiast Peter Jackson) portray zombie romance or zombie sex, they do it for laughs, or at least are cognizant that this is not the stuff of dreamy sighs and heart doodles in notebooks. You can’t play it straight. You can’t Twilightize zombies. It’s just not possible in any sort of sane world…

Oh, fuck.

That’s the promo image from the upcoming feature film Warm Bodies. Here’s the IMDB summary:

“After a zombie becomes involved with the girlfriend of one of his victims, their romance sets in motion a sequence of events that might transform the entire lifeless world.”

Here’s the Wikipedia entry, so far combining the movie and the book it was based on. The book plot:

“R is a zombie. After a zombie apocalypse, he shambles across an America filled with collapsed buildings, rusted cars, shattered windows, and abandoned high-rises. He can only grunt or moan and craves human brains to get high on their memories. After eating the brains of a suicidal teen, R is overcome with love for the teen’s companion, Julie Grigio. R rescues Julie from his zombie pack and takes her back to his lair. She eventually leaves, and R follows her back to Citi Stadium, the largest remaining human refuge…”

Now, I have not read this book. It is entirely possible that the book is a fully aware, tongue-in-cheek riff on the concept, otherwise known in societal circles as “getting the joke”. There’s no mention here, after all, of Julie returning the groaning, grunting love of her rotting would-be paramour. Also, hey, a story like King Kong proves that with enough skill involved this sort of set-up can even be a bit tragic and touching. Warm Bodies apparently goes with the Romeo & Juliet allusions instead, which doesn’t seem as good a fit, and the book cover has a Stephenie Meyer endorsement right at the top… but the concept alone doesn’t instantly, viscerally lurch up into my craw the way that the film promo image does.

There have been misleading ad campaigns before; I can in particular remember when Heathers first came out in 1988 with marketing featuring little more than Winona Ryder and Christian Slater cuddling up and imaginative taglines like “The COOLEST kids! The HOTTEST movie!”. That happened– but Heathers turned out to be far above and beyond a formulaic, vapid teen romance film; I’d go so far as to say it smartly savaged nearly everything about the genre, including daring to put forth a moral lesson that sometimes falling in love with the bad boy has bad consequences.

Should I extend the same consideration to Warm Bodies? Well, again from the wiki…

“The studio behind The Twilight Saga, Summit Entertainment, is backing the film…”

“The zombies don’t really talk in the film, so extensive voice-over will be used to express their thoughts. Director [Jonathan] Levine sought to expand the zombie mythology by making the zombies better looking than in other films…”

Uh, so… this isn’t even going to be a perspective from the protagonist? We’re going to be treated to the voice-over thoughts of more than one zombie, here? More than one “better looking” zombie? That sounds thoroughly awful. So awful I may end up longing for the unintelligibility of the Star Wars Holiday Special wookiee family.

Did I mention that on IMDB this movie is tagged as Drama, not Comedy? Because there is no way this is not a Comedy. The more it tries to Not Be A Comedy, the more Comedic it will become.

I’m with the Rifftrax forums on this one: “Holy crap, this thing is real. Let me reiterate: holy crap, this thing is really really real.”

IMDB does also have the movie categorized as ‘Horror’.

I’ll admit, I’m feeling that.

(For fiction about walking, rotting corpses that doesn’t involve trying to make them sexy to tweens, why not check out Justin’s article about his new novel, Undead on Arrival? Or you can get really out there and have a look at my ongoing webcomic, Zombie Ranch.)

About Clint

Clint Wolf is an opinionated nerd, who writes a comic (Zombie Ranch) about cowboys who wrangle zombies. We didn't claim he made sense. http://cwolf.zxq.net/
This entry was posted in Home of the Bizarre Rant, Projected Pixels and Emulsion and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Over Our Dead Bodies…

  1. Nicolle says:

    Yes, because mindless bodies of rotting flesh are just so attractive.
    There really is such a thing as taking things too far and to places they should never go. Plus, how will they justify voice overs for beings who only desire to eat brains?

  2. TJ Johnston says:

    Zombie romance? What are these people thinking?!?

  3. nerithenomad says:

    Oh god no. Not zombies. :(

  4. It kind of worked in King Kong (the “monster” saving a female from a bunch of other threats), but I’m as skeptical as everybody else. Chicks may dig scars, but this is taking it to an extreme.

  5. Sounds indeed like a comedy in the making.

  6. Which leads to the inevitable pun: “He loves her for her brains.”

  7. Raven says:

    Worst. Movie. Ever. It’s going to be a comedy whether it wants to be or not. Hehehhe…I might see it for that reason alone. Except no one will watch a movie with me because I think I’m the rifftrax guys.

  8. Sounds like one to miss

  9. All I know is just zombies are sooo darn gross!

  10. That is one of the the worst ideas I’ve ever heard. The only way they could even make it work is if they went for a tongue-in-cheek, “Shaun of the Dead” approach. Actually…it might be even funnier straight-faced.

  11. genkiduck says:

    Maybe the girl will give birth to a half-zombie child who will be immune to zombie-ism and usher in a new era of zombie-human peace relations? And sexy times will ensue…

  12. integrityisyou says:

    ICK! He might as well ingest bath salts as well, just for the ‘dramatic’ effect!

  13. sap592 says:

    I’m not sure how the movie will turn out but I suggest reading the book =]. It isn’t your typical romance, it’s actually has a strange mixture of existentialist thought, gore and romance with apocalyptic themes. It’s also written really well and has some good belly-laugh moments. Give it a go before you slam it. I think it’s a shame to put Warm Bodies in the same category as the Twilight saga.

    • Clint says:

      As I hope comes across, I’m much more lenient on the concept of the book–Stephenie Meyer gave it a positive review, but then so did Simon Pegg. That’s hopeful.

      The movie, however, is not only aping the Twilight saga in its ad material but making some atrocious choices. Like multiple voice-overs. And existing.

  14. Great(!) Just what we need-more zombie films to fuel people’s desires until the last Twilight film comes out(!) Somehow I don’t think the extensive voice-overs will give the desired effect that the director is looking for. Is it just me or does the zombie in the picture look slightly like a woman?

    • Clint says:

      In a book it’s much easier to do lengthy internal monologues, even from inhuman sources, without it being jarring to the reader. Voice-overs are a way to simulate that, but best used sparingly, if at all.

      In fact I think one of the reasons a lot of Stephen King adaptations fail is because he stuffs all his stories chock full of internal monologues, and it’s not easy to translate that to the screen in a way that maintains suspension of disbelief.

  15. The Smile Scavenger says:

    Ew. What’s with the necrophilia, Hollywood? Actually, please don’t answer that. I don’t want to know anything else.

    Sometimes my sister and I play this game where we go to the movies and pick one we haven’t heard of just to be completely surprised. It’s sort of like cinematic roulette. Thank you for bringing to my attention what movie title to avoid at all costs. :)

  16. Forget can’t, they better not Twilightize zombies. Oh gawd a half zombie child, lmao.. Awesome!!!

  17. kristennemarie says:

    First vampires, now zombies. What next?

  18. followechoes says:

    Oh my…just when I thought I’d heard it all…ewww. That is sooooo wrong. What is sexy about a zombie??? sweet FA…wouldn’t she be worried that it might fall off when they get down to business…. what will it be next?

  19. lexy3587 says:

    That’s just… wow. It’s . I can’t even articulate how horrible that premise sounds. they’re going to voice over the thoughts of the zombies?! The only thing I think we can all be grateful for is that they didn’t think of doing this for Bella in Twilight, because the entire book series, when they aren’t murmuring to each other, is her WHINY internal monologue.

  20. Pingback: Zombie Ranch - Your 1500 pageviews of fame…

  21. Pingback: Food & Wine Thursdays: Anatomy of a Wine List | The Satellite Show

  22. Pingback: Food & Wine Thursdays: Replay | The Satellite Show

  23. Pingback: Zombie Ranch - I guess you could say I warmed up to it…

  24. Pingback: Zombie Ranch » Somewhat lacking in brains.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.